× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. April 2003

Re:

Isn't the problem with qualified PFILEs in LF38 logicals? The format there is
    FILE.LIBRARY
instead of
    LIBRARY/FILE

Vern

At 10:30 PM 4/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:

Debbie,

I'm not sure what the difference is but, pf38 and lf38 objects work just
like regular 400 physicals and logicals.  i'm currently working on a box
that has a ton of these - and they do not have QSYS38 in their library
list.

Although recently, they upgraded to V5R1, and several queries that used
LF38 files blew up and would only work if the logicals were recompiled.
But, only some LF38 files needed to be recompiled.  others worked fine.

I believe your biggest problem will be the program objects with 38
attributes.

hth,

Rick



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.