RE: QNTC issues

Pete:

True enough, but most list members don't want to see a thread of "Send me a 
copy too!" replies that might go on for days. When I remember, I _try_ to keep 
my replies snipped and I _try_ to reply only when I have something to 
contribute that isn't a repeat of a bunch of other messages. Similarly, it 
seems that I should collect requests off-list as long as I tell people where to 
ask.

Further, the instructions include some warnings that are not elaborated upon by 
IBM. Perhaps it's as simple as performance degradation during the trace; 
perhaps there's a risk of overflowing internal trace spaces and hanging the 
server. Who knows?

I simply felt it was best to split off the discussion for those who have a real 
need. I try to respect the list members.

If a flood of requests hits this list, it won't be because I didn't try, eh?

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@midrange.com wrote:

>  10. RE: QNTC issues (Pete Hall)

>I'd be interested. I'll bet lots of other would too. Isn't that what this
>list is for?
>
>At 16:45 08/20/2002, Tom Liotta wrote:
>>Walden:
>>
>>I replied off-list. I can send a simple discussion of what I learned about =
>>/QNTC tracing for those who need it if they send me an e-mail request at:
>>
>>tom.liotta@powertechgroup.com
>>
>>I don't want to clutter the list nor get people into weird areas unless the=
>>y have a real need. Technically, of course, the request should go to Suppor=
>>tLine (or PWD or whomever) rather than me because I can only point out the =
>>specifics that applied to my situation.
>>
--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com



__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience 
the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/