|
Rick, Yes, if you do not have performance adjustment turned on, then all additional memory will go to *base. No, you don't need to make the machine pool bigger because you've added additional memory. Best bet would be to examine the faulting rates in your various pools, including the machine pool. The work management manual will provide guidelines for acceptable levels depending on the power of the machine. Only older manuals are available in any depth, perhaps there is something in InfoCenter. If you have oodles of memory now, why not just turn on the automatic adjustment and see where the pools settle. The auto tuning works much better than it did in the older releases and might just make your life easier and your users happier. Regards, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > On Behalf Of Rick Rayburn > Subject: We've Added more memory...but I can't remember! > > ...if I need to "goose" up the machine pool with additional "wattage". > > the memory was added because we got a great deal on the chips NOT because > we > were experiencing problems. I believe all of the additional "K" was dumped > into *BASE but I'm not certain. > Does anyone remember/know if memory additions ALWAYS dump into Base? > If it does, any GENERAL rule of thumb to follow for incrementing the > MACHINE > pool? I believe I OVER-allocated memory to the "SPOOL POOL" by granting an > average of 300 K per active writer. Any thoughts on that as well...or > anything else memory-pool related? > > Thanks all. > > Rick Rayburn
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.