RE: Problem with admistrative console

Joe,

I would think that should be enough. I thought they require about 400 CPW
minimum. I'm running 4.0.2 on an LPAR with about 440 batch CPW and WAS comes
up OK. Bloat yes. Mooooooooooooo!

I run a 1GHz/512MB PC for the console, and I sure wouldn't want to see it on
anything slower, like the fellow with 300MHz. My console starts in about 3
or 4 minutes.

This article, tweaks for underpowered machine:
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.NSF/c1309d212e616c9f862569ec0070adc1/c9
329187631b353e862569ad00404708?OpenDocument

Is there a firewall between your console and AS/400? Maybe you need to open
some more ports.

-Marty

--__--__--

From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Subject: RE: Problem with admistrative console
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:13:31 -0500
Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com

> From: Urbanek, Marty
>
> Also, you might try starting it from qshell via STRWASINST.

Thanks, Marty.  I may be forced to do the STRWASINST at some point.  And it
may well be that the machine is underpowered.  It's a model 720 rated at
420/240 CPW.  It's sad, though, that I was able to run WebSphere V2.0 on my
model 150 (albeit very slowly) with 35CPW.

Software bloat.

Joe