× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Vern
  I can testify- fractional processors  save a LOT of Money and add tons
of  flexibility

At 10:14 PM 05/31/2002 +0000, vhamberg@attbi.com wrote:
>You can do the fractional bit all over. So, with 3
>processors, say, you could have a partition with 1.2,
>another with 1.2, and another with .6 processors
>allocated. I guess the point is you can manage these
>things very finely now. Don't quite know what good it'll
>do, but someone thinks it will.
>
>I think, v5r1 and later, you can change a lot of this on
>the fly. This can be pretty useful, I think. I believe
>it has to be done manually, however, in OpsNav
> > This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > So I guess that if you have multiple processors then you should dedicate a
> > whole processor (or more) to Linux?  And thus have no need for 'Linux
> > Shared Processor'?
> >
> > Rob Berendt
> > --
> > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > Benjamin Franklin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Andy Nolen-Parkhouse" <aparkhouse@attbi.com>
> > Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> > 05/31/2002 03:57 AM
> > Please respond to midrange-l
> >
> >
> >         To:     <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> >         cc:
> >         Fax to:
> >         Subject:        RE: as/400 / linux / lpar
> >
> >
> > Rob,
> >
> > I went back to the chart and looked; I was unable to find any
> > uni-processor models which were listed as supporting Linux but not
> > supporting 'Linux Shared Processor'.  As you imply in your note, it
> > would be a theoretical impossibility.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andy Nolen-Parkhouse
> >
> > > Subject: RE: as/400 / linux / lpar
> > > What is the difference between being able to run Linux on a single
> > > processor and 'Linux Shared Processor'?  On the chart I see that some
> > > single processors support LPAR, and Linux but not 'Linux Shared
> > > Processor'.
> > >
> > > Rob Berendt
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.