|
This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Here's another thought. What are the goals? - to have os/400 on everyone's desktop, unrealistic - to have a portable 400 for demo's - to have a 400 for small businesses, already done. Let's remember, one of the goals of Op's console was to be able to remotely operate your 400, even in a dedicated mode. Basically do everything except stuff the CD's. Will you still get this with the xWindows concept? Let's say you want to market product. What will your client base be using on their desktops? Browsers, 5250, Client/Server, xWindows? I would say a bulk of the new sales would be using the first three. You need to demo in that then. Therefore I don't see where using a separate box is a drawback. Granted, let's suppose that IBM limited the system console to Op's console. You don't need a system console to IPL. You only need it to perform upgrades. Therefore I would see two attachments - 1 for the op's console, one for the ethernet. Granted, in a demo situation, you would have a wire going out of the box into a small hub, and a wire from that into your client. But let's face it, in most demos you are going to have other cables for the overhead projector and all that other junk. So it should be hidden in the clutter. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.