Re: Differences between CL/400 and ILE/CL -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Differences between CL/400 and ILE/CL
From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:35:52 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Just wondering - what ARE people doing with activation groups? They DO put
boundaries around file cursors, so you can process the same file in
different procedures without stepping on your own toes. But what else is
going on?

At 11:59 AM 4/11/02 -0400, you wrote:

>I suspect that one of the good reasons to use ILE/CL would be to operate
>within specified Activation Groups.
>
>Bill
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Differences between CL/400 and ILE/CL , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.