|
From: Patrick Botz <botz@us.ibm.com> > I only wish IBM was smart enough and agile enough to actually have the > coordination that would be required to do this manipulation "of the > customer base." Apparently, Leif thinks IBM developers sit in architecture > design discussions and say "boy that would be really cool, but it would be > too easy and, don't forget, we have to manipulate the customer base. Lets > make this really hard and complex in order to generate more calls to the > support line to make it more costly for IBM to support and to drive > customers away because it's too hard to use." It just doesn't happen... the manipulative complexity is not at the architectural level (although that is complex too) but at the marketing, support, configuration, and sizing levels. Do I know something about that? Yes, because I have been at the receiving end of that. Am I a lone voice in this? I don't think so. Is this complexity deliberate (as I claim)? This kind of complexity is not unique to IBM. I have in front of me a catalog from Dell. I can buy PCs in several configurations that are different is subtle ways such as to obscure the price of things and are such that sometimes when I need feature A I have to buy feature B as well because they are not sold separately. IBM does the same, it's called "marketing".
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.