|
I agree with Paul. If speed is not a concern and you do not want to impact performance, I'd use good old SNADS. cjg Carl J. Galgano EDI Consulting Services, Inc. 550 Kennesaw Avenue, Suite 800 Marietta, GA 30060 (770) 422-2995 - voice (419) 730-8212 - fax mailto:cgalgano@ediconsulting.com http://www.ediconsulting.com AS400 EDI, Networking, E-Commerce and Communications Consulting and Implementation http://www.icecreamovernight.com Premium Ice Cream Brands shipped Overnight FREE AS/400 Timesharing Service - http://www.ediconsulting.com/timeshare.html "You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know" - rw How 'bout 2 programs: At the sending end, it does a DSPOBJD to an outfile, reads the outfile, and saves each object -individually- to a tiny SAVF. Then send the SAVF to the other end. At the receiving end, RSTOBJ to the receiving library. This avoids the problem of duplicating the entire library to a save file. For sending, how 'bout SNADS and SNDNETF over an SNA link. SNADS guarantees that the object will get there. Eventually. (: --Paul E Musselman PaulMmn@ix.netcom.nospam.com o post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
