|
The reason I brought up SMTP and POP3 is that our AS/400 is not connected to the internet, and the only way to send email on the AS/400 (to other non-400 systems) is via SMTP. The only way into the Exchange site connector/MAPI format is through an Exchange gateway running both MAPI and SMTP. We currently send email by pointing our SMTP router to the SMTP gateway at division HQ. Our corporate policy is to REMOVE email from the server after 30 days. If I want to keep a copy of old email, I must keep it on my machine. Disk storage RE email is a non-issue for us. But point taken. I do agree with your other points. I'm waiting for the RFC that depreciates ASCII mail and promotes HTML & RTF email. :) Loyd -----Original Message----- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com' Subject: RE: Gartner Group: DO NOT USE IIS! This time I'm not simply taking the pro-MS stance, honest! <G> 1) You shouldn't be allowed to run SMTP and POP3 internally! If you're allowed to run SMTP outbound how is the company to monitor e-mail? What about virus scanning? Perhaps the footer the legal department puts on each outbound e-mail. Also, do you, the desktop user, understand the network architecture? There may be reasons that you can't send e-mail from your location and it's must be routed through another location. As for POP3, it sucks! It's extremely good at MOVING messages from the server to your PC. Now since you, of course, backup your pc every night there is no problem recovering messages when you crash your pc. Also you, of course, run a web server on your pc with the appropriate holes in the firewall to allow you to access all these locally stored messages from any web server in the world, right? How about viruses, you have the latest virus software rescan every message in your private message store when the virus definitions are updated, right? Finally, what about storage? A centralized copy of an e-mail to 30 people with an 1 meg attachment takes 1 meg to store, if every person downloads a copy it takes 30 meg. Leave e-mail on a centralized server where it belongs. Now if you want to talk IMAP maybe I'll listen, but the reality is that everyone uses POP3 not IMAP. 2) RFCs and standards won't obviate the Office 97/2K/XP format problem. MS doesn't change formats just to annoy people, they change them to include new features in the document. If you need to change the document layout to accommodate a feature you'll break old code, period, I don't care if the format was MS's proprietary one or one found in RFC123456. Yes, we can argue about ways to go about making changes backwards compatible, but come on, at some point you give up and say, move forward everyone. After all, were not all using ASCII text for our documents, that that was a standard. -Walden ------------ Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.