× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. August 2001

Re: Model 600s

(Leif breaks the mold and asks a tech question)

I would look at a later model 170 as a better choice, if you are
not married to the LPAR thingy.... Some of the smaller and older
170's can be had for a song and a dance. The biggest requirement
on V5R1 appears to be memory and DASD minimums, so you will need
a 170 that can be juiced up from that angle. I guess by the time
they get V5R2 out, it will require a TB of memory to just IPL.

The CFINT problem doesn't really show up until you move to the
270 series.



Leif Svalgaard wrote:
>
> Folks,
> Finally a technical question: I'm looking into maybe
> using an earlier AS/400 model. A 5xx or 6xx. Questions:
> 1) can they run V5R1?
> 2( can be LPARed? (think not, but want to sure)
> 3) according to Barsa's CPW chart there does not
> seem to be any distinction between batch CPW and
> interactive CPW, thus no CFINT interactive tax?
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.