RE: APYJRNCHG

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Yeah, but, SAVCHGOBJ isn't necessarily saving entire libraries, is it?
Only objects that are changed in a given library, I thought.  If so,
then there would have to be some mechanism on the SAV/RST-CHGOBJ that
recognizes that an object was deleted since the last SAVLIB (full save
of the library).

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: alan shore [SMTP:SHOREA@dime.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:23 AM
> To:   midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: APYJRNCHG
>
> In answer to your question (see paste below), I have'nt proven this,
> but deleting the object, changes the library, so the library is picked
> up as a changed object.
> Again, this has NOT been proved, but that is how it was explained to
> me. (I had exactly the same question).
>
> >>> "Bale, Dan" <D.Bale@handleman.com> 08/22/01 11:01AM >>>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Thanks, Bruce, I feel better now!
> Oh, the reason I am uncomfortable with SAVCHGOBJ.  (I'm sure someone
> was
> going to ask <g>)  Can anyone tell me what happens when you do a
> complete library save (SAVLIB) on Sunday night, delete a file from
> that
> library on Monday, do a SAVCHGOBJ on that library on Monday night,
> have
> the system crash on Tuesday, necessitating a restore of the SAVLIB
> from
> Sunday night, and a restore of the SAVCHGOBJ  from Monday night?  Will
> the file deleted on Monday be in the library after the SAVCHGOBJ is
> restored?  In other words, does the SAVCHGOBJ function handle deleted
> objects as a "change"?
>
> Dan Bale