|
I think you hit a good observation Steve. The Open Source movement (when Young and small(ish) ). After a few years, that speed and agility may may grow slower and more rigid as time goes by (as your observation noted). We shall see after another 5 years or so if it grows into a sluggish beauracrcy or not. We shall see. On the other hand, If Roch. wants to push out to 128bits, Ah, they don't have to ask no one. John ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wow, think of the disagreements on this list if there was actually something at stake, like deciding what feature to add to open source os400. I think you still need one entity in charge of the system. Someone who owns it and makes all the final decisions. The new version of apache seems to be very late, past its expected completion date. What is the holdup with a standard gui version of linux, one that can compete with our ms friends? Judging just from this list, getting peer to peer pgmrs to agree on things is like herding cats. But sure, fixing bugs. I can see how open source would excel at that. Similar, maybe, to how this list excels at getting answers to people who post questions. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.