|
Simon, Steve wrote: >>Back in the day when converting from the s36 to 400, there was an ibm >>product that allowed data transfer thru the twinax port. Is it known how >>to do that? You asekd: >No idea of the top of my head. But why would that be needed now? There are >better file transfer methods available. What was at the other end of the >twin-ax port to receive the transferred file? The box was simultaneously connected via twinax to two different hosts. Basically you took a WS ctl port from host A and a port from host B and ran them to input ports on the box. Then there was an output twinax port where you would put at least one dumb workstation. Or cable through to more WS's or twinax printers -- up to the port limit of 7 of course. The box was a little like a a twinax A/B switch -- but it kept both hosts active at the same time and enabled a hot key sequence (on dumb terminals!) to switch between hosts. Each user on the port could could hot key independently, and address 0 could also switch printers between hosts. This made for a good way to perform compatability testing and some initial training of users prior to cutover. And it made a much better A/B switch than a real A/B switch. I know a software house that used one for years as a replacment for A/B switches -- maybe they still use it. (Why anyone would rather program from a dumb terminal rather than a PC is beyond me, but that's another story...) The second function the box provided (other than dynamic A/B switching) was data transfer. Software was provided for the S/36 and AS/400 which would use display sessions as a bi-directional data pipeline. Many times in those days you did not have a compatible tape drive on each machine. This avoided the need to use tape conversion services. And you could do something like refresh all your data files every night from the old production machine to your new box. You could dedicate up to 6 twinax addresses for data transfer. It would configure those as 3180's in order to get 27x132 support so each "screenfull" of data would be larger and thus improve throughput. The original model was over $5K, but never sold well. In 1990 they started bundling it with some incentive packages to get people to move from the 36 to the 400. (I think IBM was overstocked on them...) That's how I got to use one for a conversion. Worked quite well considering the machines had no other compatible data transfer method. I think later they did a different model which did not have the A/B switching features and was strictly a data transfer box. For old S/36's without network connections (most of them!) and without compatible tape drives, this may still be a viable data transfer method. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.