|
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> > Leif, I agree with you 100%. > A proprietary protocol is a good additional security > measure. Certainly better than straight ODBC access. anything is better than ODBC :-) > > Do you agree or disagree with that statement? obviously agree > > Encrypted communication between DMZ and production machines would be the > next level, and using it would depend on the sensitivity of your data, the > level of perceived threat, and the expense you're willing to shoulder. How > easy is it to implement a triple-DES connection between two machines? How > expensive? Triple DES is fairly expensive. AES is cheap, very fast (almost as fast as simple disk I/O - see Chapter 30 of 'you-know-what').
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.