|
From: alan shore <SHOREA@dime.com> > Point taken, but a random number generator should NOT give the same result given the same initial data. You wouldn't believe what an incredible amount of money has been spent in attempting to create such a piece of software. This type of logic was first thought of by the British government decades ago, but was scrapped when they realized how limited it was. ====> true (and I agree) for RANDOM number generators, but Debbie needs a lot less, namely just a PIN generator. > > >>> "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> 08/07/01 05:06PM >>> > From: alan shore <SHOREA@dime.com> > > > Surely, this cannot be a random number generator, as the same number will > be generated at the same time of day. > > as there are only 10000 possible 4-digit PINs, so what? > If you assign 30000 PINs a day you cycle through every > number three times already. If you don't do that many > PINs, but say only 100, then the chance that you will > the same number is small. > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.