× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Counting users - rip-off
  • From: "JIM LANGSTON" <JLANGSTON@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:24:23 -0700
  • Importance: Normal

It is?  Not as far as I've seen.

Lets take WinNT for example.  I buy a 10 user license, I can use that one of
two ways,
my choice (this is before Microsoft is going to change everything).  I can
use them
per pc, or per server.

Per server says that one license is used for each PC connect to the NT
server.  Not
how many PCs I have in my network.

Even Per PC means I have one for each unique PC that connects to the server.
If I
elect to go per PC, and have 20 PCs, 10 with licenses 10 without, that's
fine.

The licensing scheme in discussion here, however, says that I would need to
buy 20
licenses even though the other 10 never connected to the NT server.

The licensing scheme here says that they are required to have one license
for every
user on their system, not every user that uses their software.

Regards,

Jim Langston

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
[mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of alan shore
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:35 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Counting users - rip-off


Why do you consider this a rip-off. Purchasing licenses for a predetermined
number of users is one of the market norms, for ANY platform

>>> "Berg, Dan" <berg@scdatacenter.com> 07/31/01 02:51PM >>>

and may we ask who this vendor is so that we can steer clear of them? :)


-----Original Message----- From: Larry Bolhuis [mailto:lbolhuis@arbsol.com]
Subject: Re: Counting users

>  BTW I got a call from one of my customers a few weeks back. They were
>being hounded by their software vendor because they had exceeded the
>number of users. Not the number in the software, the number of USER
>PROFILES on the system!!  Seems their agreement doesn't limit the number
>of users in their software (each of which must be enrolled in order to
>utilize it) but the number on the box! So all the email users (yes the
>AS/400 has happily been their mail server since 1999) get counted
>against the software even though they have *SIGNOFF for their initial
>program!! The issue has not been resolved yet but the customer believes
>they are abiding by the spirit of the agreement though not the letter of
>it.  (Wish I'd thought of it, almost 50 users BUILT IN! What a revenue
>stream.)
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.