× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Websphere: a resource hog?
  • From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:59:12 -0500
  • Importance: Normal

Cool.  WebSphere kicks butt.  ILE kicks butt.  The AS/400 is an awesome web
serving platform.  Now, remember, Nathan, we've had long discussions on CPW,
so I'll be darned if I'll get into that discussion again.  At this point, it
looks as though your ILE approach is ten times as fast as my WebSphere
approach.  But both are darned fast!  And I'm using the toolbox I/O
routines.  I'll have results with a data queue RPG server today or tomorrow.

Joe


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Nathan M. Andelin
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:06 AM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: Websphere: a resource hog?
>
>
> > Of course, that's basically just measuring WebSphere's
> > capability to generate and output HTML.  Using the
> > Java toolbox, a simple application building an 8KB page
> > from a disk file will run 5 sessions at once with a 1.3
> > seconds response time.  That's 230 hits per minute,
> > or over 12,000 per hour.
>
> Those sound like impressive results, Joe.  But I guess it all depends on
> what you compare it to.  So, I decided to run the JMeter Web Stress tool
> against one of my ILE Web Application Servers.  The ILE server reads a
> database file and builds a 6KB response containing HTML and
> fields from the
> database.  The average response time is about .6 seconds when serving 5
> simultaneous clients.
>
> The impressive thing is that this is all done with a model 170-2290, which
> has a CPW rating of 73.
>
> Nathan.
>
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.