|
midrange.com
We replace one system from a MS Access system to a 5250 system. The person
who set up the Access system set up a lousy database design. No
referential integrity, lookups or whatnot. No standard code tables.
Reporting became difficult to impossible. This fellow, while a nice guy,
with years and years of 400 experience, should have done better.
Rob Berendt
==================
Remember the Cole!
"John Taylor"
<john.taylor@telusp To:
<MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
lanet.net> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: No 5250-based
applications
owner-midrange-l@mi
drange.com
04/26/01 09:36 PM
Please respond to
MIDRANGE-L
Jim,
I have those same users!!! :)
I've NEVER heard a single one ask me to convert a GUI screen to 5250, but
I've heard plenty of them ask if we can take their application off the
"stupid old system". Not that I agree with their assessment of my beloved
400, but that's the way it is.
Having said that, I also haven't heard a single one ask me to replace their
GUI with a browser.
John Taylor
Canada
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Franz
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:44 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: No 5250-based applications
>
>
> Actually my 5250 users have complained for years about field
> exit, keyboard
> locking, no mouse, and numeric fields for entry. They think it is
> a "stupid,
> old
> system" that wont accept either 020101 or 02/01/01 or 02/01/2001 or
> 2/1/01 or 2/1/1 or 2/1/2001 in a date field. They look at me and say,
> "can't the 400 do this?" I've been trying to make all entry fields alpha,
> and
> do the editing for numbers or dates in the code. I'm just completing my
> first "data entry" cgi app, and so far the users like it. This is search,
> select,
> and order entry, with a user doing perhaps a hundred or more a day. It
> took several screens in 5250, and several in html. Was able to give them
> some new functions. To make sure screens always come from the server
> and not from cache, there is a timestamp in the url, making every url
> unique.
> Cache-no did not always work (ie5.1) I can get more data on the screen
> in html, and if the data length is too long, it wraps easily.
> For the VB comments, since I'm using a good tool (WebSmart), this is
> quick development. No client but a standard browser. The in-house users
> have asked if I can put their apps up the same way!
> Web printing is a problem (sort of). Exploder print button does
> not seem to
> format
> page breaks well. They dislike the wait of creating .pdf, but if that is
> what it
> takes, they will.
> jim
>
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
