|
In my opinion, the appropriate place for Windows is on the desktop. The appropriate place for OS/400 is for hosting database applications, Web and otherwise. One of the obsticles, is this issue of price vs. performance. The true cost of ownership argument makes sense to me, but that kind of thing is hard to define. Price and performance are real easy to understand. Microsoft, and others are doing a good job of spreading the message that PCs handle large volumes of transactions, cost less, and can be deployed in farms. People get the impression that a server is a simple commodity. If it fails, just get another one and plug it into the rack. In raising this thread, I've been looking for answers to counter-balance the price vs. performance advantage offered by Intel. Thanks to those who have answered. Hopefully, more will respond. Nathan. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.