× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




     Dan, do you have a large number of jobs hanging around with spool 
     files? If your job tables have been extended, you will see very 
     long waits indeed on the "job" commands. 
     
     Alexi responded to this issue with the following:
     
> WRKxxJOB commands work by sequentially scanning WCBT (Work Control
> Block
> Table - job control structures on AS/400). If it takes a lot of time,
> it
> indicates that WCBT is heavily fragmented.
> Two things can be done: compress WCBT or force WCBT recreation.
> To compress WCBT:
>  -   create data area:
>           CRTDTAARA DTAARA(QSYS/QWCBTCMPTB) TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(1)
> 
>      The following command will then turn on the compression of the
> WCBT
> during the IPL:
> 
>           CHGDTAARA DTAARA(QSYS/QWCBTCMPTB) VALUE('1')
> 
>      The following command will then turn off the compression of the
> WCBT
> during the IPL:
> 
>           CHGDTAARA DTAARA(QSYS/QWCBTCMPTB) VALUE('0')
> 
> To force WCBT recreation, perform manual IPL from system console, and
> on
> one of the menus you can request WCBT recreation.
>  It will remove all jobs from system, including all spool files.
> Two system values, which control WCBT allocation are QTOTJOB (initial
> allocation) and QADLTOTJOB (increment).
> 
> Best regards
>     Alexey Pytel

hth
eric.delong@pmsi-services.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: WRKSBMJOB, WRKUSRJOB slug-like 
Author:  <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> at INET_WACO
Date:    9/28/00 5:11 PM


Good grief!  WRKSBMJOB & WRKUSRJOB are absolutely slug-like on this V3R2 system.
 It can take up to 30 seconds to get a response, everything else (i.e., WRKSPLF,
WRKACTJOB) is at or near sub-second response.  This on a system where the CPU 
usage is 8.2% for a two minute interval (right now).  Is this a V3R2 issue?

I recall getting 2- or 3-second response with WRKSBMJOB even on some RISC boxes,
and had resorted to using WRKUSRJOB JOBTYPE(*BATCH) to get the subsecond 
response.  Either way, on this V3R2 box, it's a painful wait for someone who's 
used to getting it FAST.

Anything I can do to improve on this?  Cleanup of some sort?

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To 
subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. 
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---
     


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.