|
Just guesssing here, but I'd guess the AS/400 advantage then would be price. By the time the other package was delivered and running with the specs you suggest the cost would no longer be drastically lower. In <8204430704121998/A41811/TIMONE/11CC21EB0400*@MHS>, on 12/04/98 at 02:43 AM, Don Schenck <schencd%AM_LZCH%VASELL@mr.mops.wl.com> said: >I found it interesting. Consider this: WHAT IF (a BIG "what if", but >"what if" nonetheless) ... WHAT IF a combination of NT Server and a >relatively inexpensive server DID -- in fact -- give the same uptime as >an AS/400? What would THEN be the argument IN FAVOR of the AS/400?? >Peace, >-- Don Schenck >www.SchenckTech.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------- boothm@ibm.net Booth Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
