Re: Security of Volumes

[mcrump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

>I have had a request from a client to add security to media volumes.  For
>example,  John can't use volume 123456.  He would get a NOT AUTHORIZED to
>this volume.    This would mean that you could do with a media volume that
>you can do with an object of the 400.  The idea is to restrict certain
>users to confidential data on volumes.
>I would like to know what  the 400 community thinks  of this and if has
any
>value.

It has validity.  The tape management product we use
has volume security but we don't use it.

Problems I see with this are:

1.) There will be an increased workload for security
2.) The security may not match (most likely) OS/400 security.  For
example, OBJ#1 is secured from user on the AS/400.  OBJ#2 is
not secured.  Both objects are on the same volume.  What do you
do, modify you backup and volume control?

Our approach is to secure save and restore commands and to
store tapes in a controlled environment.  People who have access
to these commands and this environment have to be trusted.

Of course, there may be data and security issues that are
more stringent for other folks.





+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---