Re: Subsystem Pools

[PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Do I want QCMN and QSYSWRK to run out of the base pool?  I was not
>concerned about them running out of BASE when there was just a few jobs
>in each, but now I have over 50 jobs in QCMN, 25 jobs in QSYSWRK.
>
>Should I put these subsystems in a *shrpool?
>
>--
>Gerald Magnuson                   Sr. Programmer Analyst



That depends.  How's your system performing?  Remote response time OK?

Using a *shrpool means you can have your cake and eat it, too-- the memory
you allocate can be used all over the place!

I have a theory that you can't let everything run in the same *shrpool:
it's just like running everything in *BASE with a different name.

We start looking at pool allocations when something starts slowing down
(although AutoTune does mask any problems quite well! (quiet, Dean!)).  If
you have enough memory, I prefer allocating similar functions to a private
*shrpool (if that makes sense!).

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com


root
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---