<<
I missed the story. How long has the NT system been installed and
running? Were the savings outlined?
>>
The system was installed "recently" ... and the savings are _projected_ (of
course!).
I noticed that NOBODY quoted my FINAL paragraph, that "different needs
required differents OS's".
You (all) like to SLAM NT ... like you have some "pride of ownership" in
OS/400 ... like it's your religion or something. What's wrong? Do people
feel threatened?
I LOVE using OS/400 ... use it all day ... every day. No problem ... it's a
great operating system.
Use NT all day every day too. Never have a problem. On a network with 400+
users.
But to call the System/34 superior to NT ... now THAT'S a joke.
Open your mind folks; there's OS/400 ... OS/390 ... Unix ... Linux ... NT
... Novell ... Plan Nine <?> ... MacOS ... BeOS <?> ...
Don't see the entire world through Blue lenses.
Peace,
-- Don
root
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
