× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Premenos and the date data type window.
  • From: <BVStone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 13:15:11 -0600

IBM themselves are using this window.  That is the concern here.

Bradley V. Stone        
bvstone@taylorcorp.com
http://prairie.lakes.com/~bvstone/
"People train don't run out of Wicheta... Lessn' you're a hog, or a
cattle.  People train runs out of Stubville."

        ----Original Message-----
        From:   bvining@VNET.IBM.COM [SMTP:bvining@VNET.IBM.COM]
        Sent:   Friday, February 20, 1998 11:42 AM
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Subject:        Premenos and the date data type window.

        Charlie,

        Maybe I'm missing something, but if one does the right job now
(that is,
        move to 4-digit years or their equivalent) then why would any
additional
        work be needed in 2039?  To continue using 2-digit years (and
the 1940
        to 2039 window) is one way to "ease into 2000", but certainly
isn't
        (to me anyway) a permanent solution; much like how I
(personally) don't
        consider floating windows to be anything but a short term
workaround.

        Why would you expect IBM to have to explain why developers took
2-digit
        approaches in the late 1990s in response to this problem?  Isn't
this
        a matter of the user companies approach to the year 2000 (or at
least
        how they prioritize this work against other items)?

        Bruce Vining

        > >Charles L. Massoglia wrote:
        >
        > Date windows of 1940-2039, 1970-2069, or any other fixed
window are us ed by
        > those who do not care if their code dies in the future.  I
hope I am a live
        > in the year 2039 to see how IBM explains why we have to go
through thi s Y2K
        > thing a second time in the same century.
        >

        +---
        | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
        | To submit a new message, send your mail to
"MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
        | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
        | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
        +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.