|
** Reply to note from Jon Paris <paris@ca.ibm.com> Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:41:31 -0500 > some are lucky and just tended to design in an OO fashion anyway (even if >they > didn't know that's what they were doing!) Absolutely true. I have seen a lot of code where the different apps are similar to objects and all references to aspects of that object are handled with calls to the app. I know that that the guys who put that stuff together are naturals for OOP. I suspect that all programmers will find OOP natural. The faster the move the better. But that brings us to the bytecode generator. Don't you feel that having a bytecode generator for RPG will reduce the requirement for learning Java? Won't that slow the move to OO development and thus hurt the AS/400? I can't decide which is worth more, the byte code generator, or not having it. > Jon Paris - AS/400 AD Market Support - paris@ca.ibm.com Chris Rehm Mr.AS400@ibm.net How often can you afford to be unexpectedly out of business? Get an AS/400. root +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.