× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Cost of tape drives
  • From: Neil Palmer <npalmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 17:28:19 -0700

Hmmm - your example of backing up a 4GB PC with a 1MB Zip drive would
certainly be a little difficult.  However, as a regular diskette holds
1.44MB I presume you meant a 1GB Zip drive ?   :-)

I wouldn't say a backup option was not viable simply because you would
have to change media 4 times to save the entire system.
And backing up a small AS/400 (4GB or 8GB) on the standard 1/4" tape
than can hold about 3.5GB also could not be classified as being not
viable.  Now if you wanted to add the word 'Unattended" to the backup
description, then I would have to agree.


... Neil Palmer                                     AS/400~~~~~      
... NxTrend Technology - Canada     ____________          ___  ~     
... Thornhill, Ontario,  Canada     |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
... Phone: (905) 731-9000  x238     |__________|_|______|_|______)   
... Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x238      oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
... Fax:   (905) 731-9202         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
... mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com          http://www.NxTrend.com


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   DAsmussen [SMTP:DAsmussen@aol.com]
        Sent:   Saturday, January 17, 1998 12:55 AM
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Subject:        Re: Cost of tape drives

        Neil,

        In a message dated 98-01-14 01:20:05 EST, you write:

        > Why do you say it's a mistake ?  IBM has been hit over the
head to bring
        >  the cost of the base system down and they have done a pretty
good job of
        >  that.  If you want 8mm instead of the standard 1/4" tape then
you pay the
        >  cost.  The direction has been towards 'unbundled' prices.
Would you
        >  rather they jacked up the price of the base system to cover
the
        >  attachment cards for 8mm, when many users would not want them
?
        <<snip>>

        Don't get me wrong, I _love_ what IBM has done with base system
prices.
        However, I was offered a PC with a 4Gb drive and a 1Mb Zip drive
for backup.
        The paradigm is the same.  Would _you_ want to do a full save
from a full 4Gb
        drive to the 1Mb Zip drive?  Could you afford the time and
required media on a
        daily basis?

        Yes, you should pay the cost.  However, unviable backup options
should not be
        offered in the first place...

        JMHO,

        Dean Asmussen
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.