× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Fighting cfint (academic quwstion)
  • From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:16:40 -0500

yes you are basically correct. CFINT (or rather one of its friends)
also serves to slow down "smaller" server models (even without
using interactive). The traditional arguments for this are:
1) it makes sense for IBM to use basically the same processor
no matter what the model (cheaper to manufacture one than many)
2) you get what you pay for.
3) IBM has to compete with Sun/HP/Intel in the server market so
the pure server machine has to be cheap enough to compete, and
green screen loyalists are captive anyway and can't go anywhere else
so why not sock it to them. The subtle message is that IBM wants
you to get off the iSeries and on to the pSeries.

Makes sense?


----- Original Message -----
From: shahar mor <shahar_mor@yahoo.com>
To: <MI400@midrange.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:00 PM
Subject: Fighting cfint (academic quwstion)


> Hi all,
>
> This is purely academic question yet i'm aruing this
> issue with a collegue for sometime now.
> so i'm asking out of 'academic curiosity'
>
> The facts:
>
> ibm mistreats it's installed base. Whenever you buy a
> 'server model' and use interactive application a
> looped task named cfint starts eating your cpu.
>
> i'm sure this task is needed only to make current
> customer pay more for the existing applications and it
> is not hardware related (here the argue begins..)
>
> If i'm correct and this cfint is software based then
> in teory somehow one may expect to 'cheat it' if it is
> hardware then even in teory this is not doable.
>
> Bottom line:
>
> Am i right ? if i had the internal knowledge will it
> be possible to slow down "crazy" cfint thus paying
> less for the same performance ?
>
> Thanks for any input, and once again i'm NOT trying
> anything harmfull in this post(although ibm deserves
> criticism over their current policy).
>
> Regards
>
>
> =====
> Shahar mor
> consultant
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
> +---

+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.