RSE confusion

I suspect the design team was pulled 90 degrees off course by some suit who
couldn't develop a hangover at a wake, much less an application.

If there is a strategic direction for the iSeries development toolset, it
will be clear after we've passed the station.  I doubt IBM knows which way
they're going; it seems like the game is to track the rest of the industry
in an attempt to prove the iSeries is a "server".  Today it's Eclipse; who
knows what "lunacy" it will be tomorrow?

If iSeries users aren't adopting these new tools, perhaps it's because
they're buggy or confusing.  Or maybe it's because they show up and there's
no continuity from one tool to another.

I think CODE is a great and highly productive product when used in the LAN
environment; I've been complaining about problems in the WAN and dial-up
environment for almost 18 months; I've gotten sympathy and kind words but no
results.  The Toronto group does what Buell Duncan tells them to do, and
it's anybody's guess after that.

While RSE is clearly a major effort, I'll admit to wondering why it's shown
up and how it helps me (an application developer) or my customers (most of
whom have single systems).  I have tons of application development on
backlog and I do not have time to experiment.  I left my ouija board in the
car: I don't have the patience to divine what IBM is up to, and I don't
appreciate some goofy bleeding-edge marketing/public relations program
masquerading as IBM's latest-and-greatest.  My customers and I pay big bucks
for OS/400 and I'm not seeing value.

We see consistent enhancements to ILE RPG; this is one bright area.  Phil,
George, Barbara, Hans and others: thanks!

I think most of us in the iSeries environment have *no interest at all* in a
standardized, cross-platform development toolset.  The iSeries is unique and
our tools need to give us the ability to take advantage of the power and
flexibility obvious to everybody on the planet except IBM senior management.
Java is clearly the right choice for many functions (I'll refrain from using
"applications") but I have no interest in Java-for-the-sake-of-Java, which
seems to be IBM's litany.  Or is it Linux-for-the-sake-of-Linux?  I can't
keep track.

IBM needs to fix CODE.  They need to get serious about a non-5250,
non-WebSphere interface for the iSeries.  HTML/JavaScript is fine; just have
support integrated into OS/400. [Sidebar: look at what Mel Rothman and
Giovanni Perotti have done in their spare time with CGIDEV2.  What is the
rest of IBM up to?].  IBM needs to provide butt-kickingly efficient tools
for developers, with lots of training aids and support.  I'll pay a lot per
seat but I want results.

It's sad that IBM was so far in front of the pack with the iSeries...

-reeve

-----Original Message-----
From: code400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:code400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of MWalter@hanoverwire.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:51 AM
To: code400-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: RSE commands ?


<snip>
This WSSDa looks promising, but it looks like IBM already created such a
confusion that nobody knows the difference (WDSc, WSSDa, WDT, WSAD, ...)
and strategic direction anymore.
</snip>

And this differs from any other IBM offering?


Thanks,

Mark


Mark Walter
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc.
mwalter@hanoverwire.com
http://www.hanoverwire.com
717.637.3795 Ext.3040

_______________________________________________
This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l
or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.