RE: CPO work properly on Win2K?

Those Microserfs...well, they're the future of the human race, aren't they?

-----Original Message-----
From: code400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:code400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of John Taylor
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:50 PM
To: code400-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: CPO work properly on Win2K?

Chris,

You can't upgrade your ME installation to W2K. You'll have to do a scratch
install.


John Taylor


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Proctor" <cproctor@gartsports.com>
To: <code400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:23
Subject: Re: CPO work properly on Win2K?


> Ok, now for the big question....if it's so bad, can I reinstall win2k
without
> totally screwin' up my PC?
>
> "Shaw, Dave" wrote:
>
> > Jon,
> >
> > Almost as reliable, AND on a Pentium II 400 MHz with 128 MB it's almost
as
> > fast as OS/2 was on a 486/66 with 32 MB.  What's not to like about that?
> > <grin>
> >
> > Dave Shaw
> >


_______________________________________________
This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l
or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.