× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



All,

Trying to figure out what (older?) cypher we need to turn on our 7.4 box.

Here's what's supported at the server (according to
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest)

Cipher Suites
# TLS 1.2 (server has no preference)
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xa) WEAK 112
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (0x2f) WEAK 128
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (0x3c) WEAK 128
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0x9c) WEAK 128
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (0x35) WEAK 256
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (0x3d) WEAK 256
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0x9d) WEAK 256

Currently enabled via *OPSYS is showing
*AES_128_GCM_SHA256
*AES_256_GCM_SHA384
*CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
*ECDHE_ECDSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
*ECDHE_ECDSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
*ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
*ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
*ECDHE_ECDSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
*ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256

I would have thought that the remote server's
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 would have match the IBM's
*AES_256_GCM_SHA384 but apparently not?

Thanks!
Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.