×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




To clarify, my question is why Kerberos in Apache doesn't work with the fully-qualified name. Kerberos in iNav works equally fine with the short name or the fully-qualified name.


I understand why the cert wants the fully-qualified name. It's working as expected.


________________________________
From: Justin Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 4:34 PM
To: WEB400 (web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Fully-qualified name & Kerberos

I use Kerberos authentication for my Apache server that hosts my CGI apps. The URL's use the unqualified hostname (e.g. http://myHost/<http://my_host/>).

I'm now trying to set up HTTPS. I already have an SSL cert, but the tricky part is that the cert is for myHost.domainName.com (I didn't do it, and I didn't have any say in the matter). If I try https://myHost/<https://my_host/>, it gives me a cert error, due to the name mismatch. If I try https://myHost.domainName.com<https://my_host.domain_name.com>, FF gives "Authentication Required", while Chrome & IE prompt for a login.

I tried the fully-qualified name in iNav, and Kerberos worked perfectly.

Any thoughts?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.