Browser compliance -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Browser compliance
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:43:56 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have about a dozen tiny CGIDEV2 apps. The one I'm looking at now is about a page and a half (HTML with embedded JS). I got burned by a JS function that's not supported in IE10, and I'm considering options to ensure browser compliance. I've been looking at transpilers, but they all seem like massive overkill (I need a source project with a directory structure when I can almost put all the code on a single screen?).

Anyone have any thoughts or advice?

TIA

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Browser compliance , Nathan Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.