|
I am paraphrasing from what I believe was stated by Larry Bolhuis on
Midrange-L. In short, 2048 is sufficient and 4096 will consume (a lot?)
more CPU to do the encryption/decryption. He recommended going with 2048
and that's what I've done this past year.
Aaron Bartell
litmis.com - Services for open source on IBM i
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Joe W Holt <joe.holt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey everyone, time to renew our cert. Notice that 4096 encryption level is
available on 7.1. With all the issues with encryption the last couple years
should I go ahead and renew with the higher level or stick with 2048?
Research tells me most browsers support the higher level now but the impact
on the server to do the handshake is supposed to be 8 to 10 times larger.
Is the standard acceptance still at 2048? Any feedback appreciated.
***
Regards,
Joe W Holt
Sr Programmer/Developer
Jack Onofrio Dog Shows, LLC
405.427.8181
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.