|
On 23 Oct 2015, at 21:31, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, Keven; If your application is doing nested
record retrieval, then you you may end up coding nested call-backs, which
could become rather deep. So you're still in "hell", but "promises" makes
the syntax a bit more palatable.
Why not just "call" an RPG program to handle nested record retrieval, as
opposed to coding nested call-backs in Node.js?
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
___________________________________________
This email has been scanned by iomartcloud.
http://www.iomartcloud.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.