× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Correct.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

On 8/13/13 1:07 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
Routing entries pointing to the pool identifier, right?


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Yes, the Zend Server and the HTTP server should be in the same memory.
>
>Make sure to check the routing entries to be sure the memory is being
>used as you expect it.
>
>Jim Oberholtzer
>Chief Technical Architect
>Agile Technology Architects
>
>On 8/13/13 12:40 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> >Jim - I set up a new *SHRPOOL entry and changed the ZENDSVR6 subsystem to
> >use that shared pool:
> >
> >Subsystem description: ZENDSVR6 Status: ACTIVE
> >
> >Pool Storage Activity
> > ID Size (K) Level
> > 1 *SHRPOOL6
> >
> >Are you saying that I should change the QHTTPSVR subsystem to use the
>same
> >shared pool? And that I should change the Activity Level for the pool
> >definition in the SBSD to 200?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
> >midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> >If you move QHTTPSVR subsystem and it's jobs into a shared memory pool,
> >> >make sure to move the ZendSvr subsystem into that same memory. The Zend
> >> >server uses memory in very specific ways that make the two sets of jobs
> >> >need to run in the same memory.
> >> >
> >> >I think that is a very good thing to do, but they have to go together.
> >> >
> >> >As far as the shared pools vs. fixed memory pool, stay with a shared
> >> >pools and set the paging option to *CALC. Threads will be about 200 to
> >> >start depending on how many Apache servers are running.
> >> >
> >> >Jim Oberholtzer
> >> >Chief Technical Architect
> >> >Agile Technology Architects
> >> >
> >> >On 8/13/13 9:03 AM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> >>> > >Hi folks -
> >>> > >
> >>> > >Implementing a PHP solution on an E6C system. Lots of memory, lots
>of
> >> >disk,
> >>> > >system isn't overworked at this point. V7R1. System value QPFRADJ
>is set
> >> >to
> >>> > >3 (Automatic Adjustment). Default Zend Server 6 installation uses
>*BASE
> >>> > >memory pool.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >Zend Server performance is lousy. Much slower page load and data
> >> >retrieval
> >>> > >than the same code on the development system. Lots of Toolkit and
>stored
> >>> > >procedure use.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >I'm thinking that the first step would be to establish a fixed
>memory
> >> >pool
> >>> > >just for Zend Server, set it to *NOMAX for threads, and see how it
>runs.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >What tuning recommendations, for both Apache and Zend, do you folks
> >>> > >suggest? Any good documentation on this?
> >>> > >
> >>> > >Thanks!
> >>> > >--
> >> >
> >> >--
>
>--


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.