Re: Summing up the Icebreak discussion

[Henrik RÃtzou <hr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bent,

so what you are saying is - that Icebreak is a complety
*proprietary*<http://www.google.com/search?hl=da&rls=com.microsoft:da:IE-SearchBox&&sa=X&ei=atAkTbbTCoi54ga685HoCQ&ved=0CBcQvwUoAQ&q=proprietary&spell=1>
product
only own by, developed and mantained by Niels ;-)

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Bent RÃnne <BRO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Gents
>
> As part of the IceBreak development team with Niels, let me clarify a
> couple of things.
>
> IceBreak does not in any way use other server technologies. IceBreak is a
> 100% ILE native HTTP server - and that is it. No Apache! IceBreak was
> developed by a team of OS/400 developers with broad backgrounds.
>
> IceBreak has absolutely nothing to do with Apache, CGI2DEV, Tomcat - or
> anything else for that matter. When the IceBreak HTTP server is running it
> listens directly to TCP/IP and waits for a HTTP request from the browser.
>
> When Niels mentioned that Apache is involved, that was a misunderstanding.
> Niels meant that internally at System & Method we use an Apache server as a
> relay in front of IceBreak and other servers in house. This is done ONLY
> because of all our internal server traffic between different servers
> installed in our complex server farm! This has absolutely nothing to do with
> IceBreak!
>
> Regards,
>
> Bent
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] PÃ
> vegne af Nathan Andelin
> Sendt: 5. januar 2011 19:29
> Til: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
> Emne: Re: [WEB400] Summing up the Icebreak discussion
>
> Kevin, thanks for the reply.  If you don't see an IBM i HTTP server running
> that
> does add a new twist.  Maybe Niels wrote his own HTTP server based on
> Apache,
> like IBM did.  If he did, that would clear up a lot of confusion about this
> thread.
>
> -Nathan
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 10:46:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [WEB400] Summing up the Icebreak discussion
>
> All I know is that I am running Renaissance on a test machine with IceBreak
> with
> no Apache server running anywhere at all.
> There are no IBM Apache functions/programs in the stack at all that I can
> see.
> If Apache is being used, then it is well embedded and hidden - but I doubt
> it.
>
> The statement about front-ending IceBreak apps with Apache just tells me
> that
> they can run as IceBreak app behind an Apache server as an alternative to
> an
> IceBreak server, or they can link an Apache server to Icebreak as a remote
> proxy
> device or something like that.  It doesn't mean that all IceBreak apps are
> running with Apache running the show on the front end.
>
> I am sure they will correct me if I am wrong.
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.