Re: IceBreak as an alternative to Apache? -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Den 01/01/11 15.45, Aaron Bartell skrev:

I am in over my head with talking about the network TCP/IP layer, but
essentially, yes, that is what I was alluding to. I am more repeating what
IBM told me than understanding all of the implications of what they said.

No problem. I am just interested in learning what limitations you may have encountered and under what circumstances to prepare for them.

If it is the buffer in the network layer that got full, I agree with the IBM developer that you should not increase the buffer since this does not solve the actual problem, namely that your programs do not accept new incoming connections fast enough to keep up.

I dont' have access to a 7.1 machine on my LAN, though I could spin up an
IBM Virtual Loaner Instance.

Might be quite interesting, but perhaps not if the problem is in your code. Perhaps you want to create a "just return a tiny response immediately" to the accept code, to see if the i can keep up for longer with your load inducer on your local network if you do not do any processing.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.