Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages? -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:00:07 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 21/04/10 19.50, Dean, Robert skrev:

- Ajax is baked in well enough to do some fairly
sophisticated things (partial rendering) without
JavaScript.

To be precise, JavaScript _you_ have to write (which is an excellent thing)

Mojarra (reference JSF) generates tons of Javascript.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.