Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages? -- WEB400

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:00:07 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 21/04/10 19.50, Dean, Robert skrev:

- Ajax is baked in well enough to do some fairly
sophisticated things (partial rendering) without
JavaScript.

To be precise, JavaScript _you_ have to write (which is an excellent thing)

Mojarra (reference JSF) generates tons of Javascript.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.