×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Kevin Schroeder
Technology Evangelist
Zend Technologies, Ltd.
www.zend.com
www.twitter.com/kpschrade
www.eschrade.com
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tom Deskevich
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:40 AM
To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WEB400] MAJOR information leaked out about
thefutureofPHPinmeeting I attended.
Ok, you switched me from i5_execute to i5_program_call
array(8) { [0]=> int(263) [1]=> int(9) [2]=> string(51) "Wrong parameter
count for i5_program_call function " [3]=> string(0) "" ["num"]=>
int(263) ["cat"]=> int(9) ["msg"]=> string(51) "Wrong parameter count
for i5_program_call function " ["desc"]=> string(0) ""
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kevin Schroeder
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:21 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] MAJOR information leaked out about the
futureofPHPinmeeting I attended.
Nope. What you are doing is taking the "prepare" resource and trying to
get the result from that. What I believe you want to be doing is taking
the "execute" resource and extracting the result from there.
However, the example that I see in the docs that uses i5_fetch_assoc()
seem to use i5_program_prepare and not i5_prepare. If that is the case
your code should look something like
If I were to venture a guess it looks like you might have combined the
i5_prepare/execute code with the i5_program_prepare/call logic.
Kevin Schroeder
Technology Evangelist
Zend Technologies, Ltd.
www.zend.com
www.twitter.com/kpschrade
www.eschrade.com
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tom Deskevich
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:04 AM
To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WEB400] MAJOR information leaked out about the future
ofPHPinmeeting I attended.
I think you meant to put the WAS on the next line down?
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kevin Schroeder
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:42 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] MAJOR information leaked out about the future of
PHPinmeeting I attended.
Maybe I'm missing something here but shouldn't it be
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.