×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
From: Vern Hamberg
It is obvious to me that <name> and <child> were siblings ...
Still confused!
It was clear to me that <name> and <child> were siblings, too. But if I understand correctly, one of Henrik's points was that the <children> tag would cause the parser to establish an array of <child> nodes within the <children> array, if the <children> tag were present. I think that's true. But I also think a parser would establish an "unnamed" array of <child> nodes anyway, whether embedded in <children> or embedded in <client>.
-Nathan.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
