|
I think the crucial point is where the ownership to the the table is placed. If the framework is designed to do it all starting from scratch - like Rails if I understand it correctly - then it makes perfect sense that Rails owns it.The next Rails challenge is to get a rails app running using alegacy database table. That is, a table that hasn't implemented
some simplifying conventions designed for Rails (like a primary key called
ID and primary keys that are identity columns).
Things like this in the latest frameworks makes me wonder how much long term
real world experience some of these framework writers have. Hibernate (
www.hibernate.org) suffers from the same issues of idealogical DB structures
(at least it did in V2.x, not so sure about V3.x). Note I am not saying the
majority of RPG shop table structures are good, but they do/did account for
a lot of major company's data back-ends.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.