Re: Browser stats

You have the rigth to not agree, I'm curious: wich part, or all you don't agree?

If all browsers respected the w3c standards the development will not waste any money.
If the product was superior, they would not have breaken the monopoly laws.
If it was not ileagal, Wy they had to pay so big of a fine?

On the ohter hand, if it wasn't for the competition, you will be using w 95 and ie2 with a different face and a much bigger price. Be thankfull to Linux users.

Maurice O'Prey wrote:

I respect your opinion, but I do not agree with it.

Maurice


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Raul A. Jager W.
Sent: 01 August 2008 20:29
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Browser stats

The problem does not come from the multiple browsers, but from the one that is not standard, neither better than the others, but it grabed a big user base by ilegaly forcing user into it.
The fines that they had to pay does not compensate for the damage they have done to users and developers.
____________________________________________________________________________
___________________
Maurice O'Prey wrote:

Who wants a browser war?

The fact that there are multiple browsers wastes many millions of dollars a
year in development costs!

Lets just have one please....

Maurice


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Gibbs
Sent: 01 August 2008 14:41
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: [WEB400] Browser stats (was: Need advice on reliable way to
identifyIE asthe browser)

Maurice O'Prey wrote:

Some of we poor souls (about 80% of us) choose to use IE.

Not to start a browser war ... but according to Google Analytics, only 70%
of the visitors to the midrange.com list archives are using IE. 26% are
using Firefox, and 1% are using Opera. The remaining use Safari,

Konqueror,

and others.

david