Re: Question about QZSRCGI. -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Question about QZSRCGI.
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:05:06 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Crispin wrote:

Hmmm...I see consistent sub-second response times from a CGI application
that does not keep persistent connections :-)

Well, you certainly can get acceptable performance. But you get better performance with persistent connections, and you can support much more sophisticated applications. For example, you're not doing paging over large ad-hoc queries in your application, are you?

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Question about QZSRCGI. , Crispin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.