RE: [WEB400] WAS Express/Base vs. Tomcat

["Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am starting the entire server so I am expecting it to take a little
longer, but 10 minutes is a little too much for me.  This is a dev
server and I don't believe we have memory allocated to it specifically.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 4:43 PM
To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: [WEB400] WAS Express/Base vs. Tomcat

Aaron, are you giving that server enough memory?  I never have to wait
that long for an application to start up.  Also, are you shutting down
the entire application server instance, or just the application?

In any case, Tomcat will probably run faster - it's leaner, and doesn't
know about things like Enterprise Applications.  But it's also not
supported, except by the Open Source community, and you get what you pay
for there.

Joe

> From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)
> 
> As I sit here and wait 5 more minutes for a WAS Express server to 
> startup (which has just three small apps installed, and I have already

> been waiting 5 minutes)


_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To
post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/web400.