[WEB400] RE: XML vs. Name Value pair

["Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I know you were being facetious but heck, I have the code so why not show
it.  This is not the code for the document I showed earlier because the
project is next on my priority list.

This program (http://mowyourlawn.com/temp/MSHPNOTFN.txt) serializes and
parses a Shipping Notification document
(http://mowyourlawn.com/temp/ShipAck.xml).  Yes parsing XML in RPG isn't
very elegant, and yes I am very aware of that :-)  Why do I do it, because
Java is slow enough on the iSeries that I thought I would give it a shot.

Aaron Bartell  



-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan M. Andelin [mailto:nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: XML vs. Name Value pair was ->RE: [WEB400] XML and RPG-CGI,
is XML needed. was -> HolyWar . . ..


> From: "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Very valid question and I dislike the extra data as much as
> the next guy, but to make my point more valid let me give you
> an example where I thought XML would be better than a
> POST with name value pairs.  Tell me how you
> would put this into name value pairs -
> http://mowyourlawn.com/temp/ValuePair.xml

First show us the code for extracting the values from the XML document ;-)

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com


_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.