×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Not sure of the differences.  I'd look up the API docs at
IBM.  Maybe that will help decipher the difference.

Brad

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:53:52 -0500
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@taylorcorp.com> wrote:
> I am finding that I need to write my own sub procedures
> to do the socket
> writes because they are conflicting with what I want to
> send.  I think that
> may be my problem. . .  Now that I know I should be able
> do multiple writes
> I will go forward with that.
>
> One other question.  What are the benefits to using
> send() and recv() vs.
> read() and write() to do my socket processing?  In Scott
> Klements tutorial
> he uses send() and recv() and in the GETURI tool Brad
> Stone uses read() and
> write().  Just wondering.
>
> Aaron Bartell
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Stone [mailto:brad@bvstools.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:30 AM
> To: web400@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: [WEB400] HTTP Headers



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.