|
Not sure of the differences. I'd look up the API docs at IBM. Maybe that will help decipher the difference. Brad On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:53:52 -0500 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@taylorcorp.com> wrote: > I am finding that I need to write my own sub procedures > to do the socket > writes because they are conflicting with what I want to > send. I think that > may be my problem. . . Now that I know I should be able > do multiple writes > I will go forward with that. > > One other question. What are the benefits to using > send() and recv() vs. > read() and write() to do my socket processing? In Scott > Klements tutorial > he uses send() and recv() and in the GETURI tool Brad > Stone uses read() and > write(). Just wondering. > > Aaron Bartell > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Stone [mailto:brad@bvstools.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:30 AM > To: web400@midrange.com > Subject: Re: [WEB400] HTTP Headers
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.