|
> From: "Richard B Baird" > eventually I'll get a copy of all > my CGI programs running in each RP job? Yes, if you have enough users hitting your programs. Or if a user double clicks on a CGI link, the program will become activated in at least 2 RP jobs, for example. Programs remain active in the RP job until the HTTP Server is shut down. Or (as you mentioned) the RP Job is ended by the operator. > as the application grows, will this hinder or help performance > (both of the web ap and any other batch or interactive jobs on > the system)? Named activation dramatically increases CGI performance, initially. That's because the program remains "active" after the 1st call. If you write enough CGI programs, and they all become active in each of the RP jobs, you'll eventually reach a point where named activation hinders overall system performance. For example, 100 CGI programs and 40 RP jobs could lead to 4000 active program instances. > If I name my activation groups, how should I name them? > all first level programs with the same activation group? I can't think of a good reason to use any more than one named activation group for all CGI programs. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.