× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WEB400
  3. February 2002

Re: HTTP Servers' CGI Performance, Was Upgrading to V5R1

Brad,

Please ignore my other question about classic/Apache at V5R1. I just saw
this in a later mail.


Thanks

Adam Driver
Technical Consultant
Kaz Computer Services
Level 7, 66 Wentworth Ave
Surry Hills, Sydney    NSW   2010
Phone : + 61 2 9844 0386
www.kaz.com.au



The CGI numbers in the V5R1 book are slightly better than those in the V4R5
book.  As far as classic versus pbA in V5R1, the V5R1 book says:

  V5R1 provides the new HTTP Server (powered by Apache)
  and continues to support the HTTP Server (original).
  The performance information provided in the tables
  represents HTTP Server (powered by Apache). In general,
  the performance of the two servers is fairly similar,
  so at a high level, the tables also reflect the
  performance of the HTTP Server (original). In order
  to achieve the best possible performance, especially
  with the HTTP Server (powered by Apache), make sure
  that you get the latest PTFs:
  http://www.ibm.com/eserver/iseries/software/http

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.